Why No Leaning In Means There Is No Discernment Counseling

This lesson emphasizes the necessity of having a leaning-in partner in discernment counseling. Without a leaning-in partner, the discernment counseling protocol is likely to break down, as it requires a champion for the marriage to drive the process forward.

Key Points:

Mixed Agenda Couples:

  • Discernment counseling is designed for mixed agenda couples, where one partner is leaning-out and ambivalent about therapy, and the other is leaning-in and wants to pursue therapy.
  • The presence of a leaning-in partner is crucial for the protocol to be effective.

Why a Leaning In Partner is Necessary:

  • Champion for the Marriage: The leaning-in partner serves as a champion for the marriage, injecting energy and commitment into the process.
  • Clarity for the Leaning-Out: The leaning-out partner needs to see that the other partner is committed to trying to reconcile, which influences their discernment process.
  • Ethical Commitment: A lifetime commitment requires someone to care about maintaining it, and the leaning-in partner provides that commitment.

Consequences of Not Having a Leaning-In Partner

  • Lack of Energy: Without a leaning-in partner, the therapist cannot be the only one championing the marriage, as they are not present in the couple's daily life.
  • Transactional Relationship: If neither partner is committed to the effort, the relationship can feel transactional, like a business contract, rather than a lifelong commitment.
  • Protocol Breakdown: The discernment counseling protocol is less likely to work if there is no leaning-in partner, as the leaning-out partner may not see enough reason to try.

Phone Screen Intervention:

  • During the phone screen, therapists should assess whether there is a clear leaning-in partner.
  • If the leaning-in partner is ambivalent, therapists should explain the importance of having a champion for the marriage and the likelihood of divorce if neither partner is committed to trying.
  • This conversation can serve as a crisis intervention, helping the ambivalent partner realize the importance of their role in the discernment process.

Operational Commitment to Path Three:

  • The leaning-in partner should be operationally committed to path three (couples therapy), signaling their willingness to try and work on the marriage.
  • This commitment does not mean they are sure about the marriage's future but indicates their willingness to engage in the therapeutic process.

Conclusion:

The presence of a leaning-in partner is essential for the success of discernment counseling. This partner serves as a champion for the marriage, providing the energy and commitment needed to drive the process forward. Therapists should assess for a leaning in partner during the phone screen and intervene if necessary to clarify the importance of this role in the discernment process.